VS
At a Glance
Power
70 kW
70 kW
Torque
160 Nm
175 Nm
Fuel
TBA l/100km
5.4 l/100km
Towing
—
—
0-100 km/h
—
10.8 s
Engine
electric cc
999 cc
Choosing between the Dongfeng Box and the Volkswagen Polo is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Dongfeng Box delivers 70 kW while the Volkswagen Polo produces 70 kW. On fuel, the Box returns TBA l/100km while the Polo uses 5.4 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R459 000 for the Box and R420 800 for the Polo. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
70 kW
70 kW
Torque
160 Nm
175 Nm
0-100 kph
—
10.8 s
Top Speed
140 Km/h
187 Km/h
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
electric cc
999 cc
Engine Layout
—
inline
Cylinders
—
3
Fuel Type
electric
petrol
Forced Induction Device
—
turbocharger
Transmission
automatic
manual
Number of Gears
—
5
Drive Wheels
front
front
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
TBA l/100km
5.4 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
32.6 kWh l
40 l
CO2 Emissions
—
124 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4020 mm
4074 mm
Width
1810 mm
1751-1964 mm
Height
1570 mm
1451 mm
Wheelbase
2663 mm
2552 mm
Ground Clearance
—
106 mm
Kerb Weight
1243 Kg
1067 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Load Volume
—
351 l
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
—
—
Load Capacity
375 l
575 l
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
2
6
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
—
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
—
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
—
Optional
Adaptive Cruise Control
—
Optional
Bluetooth
—
✓ Standard
Satellite Navigation
—
Optional
Reversing Camera
—
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
—
✓ Standard
Sunroof
—
Optional
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
Optional
Alloy Wheels
—
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
5 vehicle / 8 battery + high voltage par
3
Warranty Distance
150000 vehicle / 200000 battery + high v
120000 Km
Service Plan
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
5
3
Service Plan Distance
100000
45000
Service Intervals
—
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Volkswagen Polo
1 / 4 categories
Performance
Tied
Fuel Economy
Tied
Value
Polo
Practicality
Tied
Pros & Cons
Dongfeng Box
Well-rounded specification
Higher starting price
Volkswagen Polo
Lower starting price (R420 800)
Few notable weaknesses
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Box or Polo?
The Box uses TBA l/100km and the Polo uses 5.4 l/100km on the combined cycle. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Box or Polo?
The Box produces 70 kW and 160 Nm of torque while the Polo delivers 70 kW and 175 Nm of torque. They produce similar power outputs.
What is the price difference between the Box and Polo?
The Box starts from R459 000 and the Polo from R420 800. The Polo is cheaper by R38 200 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Box or Polo?
The Box has a braked towing capacity of 0 Kg and the Polo can tow not specified. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Box or the Polo?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.