VS
At a Glance
Power
154 kW
110 kW
Torque
500 Nm
350 Nm
Fuel
7.5 l/100km
7.0 l/100km
Towing
3500 Kg
2100 Kg
Engine
1996 cc
1899 cc
Choosing between the Ford Everest and the Isuzu mu-X is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Ford Everest delivers 154 kW while the Isuzu mu-X produces 110 kW. On fuel, the Everest returns 7.5 l/100km while the mu-X uses 7.0 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R1 041 000 for the Everest and R752 300 for the mu-X. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
154 kW
110 kW
Torque
500 Nm
350 Nm
Top Speed
—
—
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1996 cc
1899 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
diesel
diesel
Forced Induction Device
turbocharger
turbocharger
Transmission
automatic
automatic
Number of Gears
10
6
Drive Wheels
rear
rear
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
7.5 l/100km
7.0 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
76 l
80 l
CO2 Emissions
198 g/km
185 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4940 mm
4850 mm
Width
2015-2234 mm
1870 mm
Height
1844 mm
1820 mm
Wheelbase
2900 mm
2855 mm
Ground Clearance
220 mm
235 mm
Kerb Weight
2341 Kg
1905 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
7
Load Volume
259-898-1823 l
—
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
3500 Kg
2100 Kg
Load Capacity
759 l
734 l
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
—
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
—
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
6
7
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
—
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Satellite Navigation
✓ Standard
—
Reversing Camera
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Tow Bar
✓ Standard
—
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
4
5
Warranty Distance
120000 Km
120000 Km
Service Plan
Optional
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
6
6
Service Plan Distance
90000
90000
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Tie
2 / 4 categories
Performance
Everest
Fuel Economy
mu-X
Value
mu-X
Practicality
Everest
Pros & Cons
Ford Everest
More powerful engine (154 kW)
Higher towing capacity (3500 Kg)
Higher fuel consumption (7.5 l/100km)
Higher starting price
No factory service plan
Isuzu mu-X
Better fuel economy (7.0 l/100km)
Lower starting price (R752 300)
Factory service plan included
Less power than rival (110 kW vs 154 kW)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Everest or mu-X?
The Everest uses 7.5 l/100km and the mu-X uses 7.0 l/100km on the combined cycle. The mu-X is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Everest or mu-X?
The Everest produces 154 kW and 500 Nm of torque while the mu-X delivers 110 kW and 350 Nm of torque. The Everest is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the Everest and mu-X?
The Everest starts from R1 041 000 and the mu-X from R752 300. The mu-X is cheaper by R288 700 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Everest or mu-X?
The Everest has a braked towing capacity of 3500 Kg and the mu-X can tow 2100 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Everest or the mu-X?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.