VS
At a Glance
Power
125 kW
135 kW
Torque
405 Nm
430 Nm
Fuel
7.4 l/100km
8.3 l/100km
Towing
3500 Kg
3500 Kg
Engine
1996 cc
2442 cc
Choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Mitsubishi Triton is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Ford Ranger delivers 125 kW while the Mitsubishi Triton produces 135 kW. On fuel, the Ranger returns 7.4 l/100km while the Triton uses 8.3 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R735 000 for the Ranger and R889 990 for the Triton. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
125 kW
135 kW
Torque
405 Nm
430 Nm
Top Speed
—
—
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1996 cc
2442 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
diesel
diesel
Forced Induction Device
turbocharger
turbocharger
Transmission
automatic
automatic
Number of Gears
10
6
Drive Wheels
all
all
Full Time 4x4
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Low Range
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
7.4 l/100km
8.3 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
80 l
75 l
CO2 Emissions
196 g/km
220 g/km
Dimensions
Length
5350 mm
5320 mm
Width
2015-2208 mm
1865 mm
Height
1886 mm
1795 mm
Wheelbase
3270 mm
3130 mm
Ground Clearance
237 mm
228 mm
Kerb Weight
2113 Kg
1965 Kg
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
3500 Kg
3500 Kg
Load Capacity
1117 l
—
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
—
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
7
7
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Reversing Camera
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Keyless Entry
—
✓ Standard
Tow Bar
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Alloy Wheels
Optional
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
4
5
Warranty Distance
120000 Km
unlimited Km
Service Plan
Optional
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
6
5
Service Plan Distance
90000
90000
Service Intervals
15000
10000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Ford Ranger
2 / 4 categories
Performance
Triton
Fuel Economy
Ranger
Value
Ranger
Practicality
Tied
Pros & Cons
Ford Ranger
Better fuel economy (7.4 l/100km)
Lower starting price (R735 000)
Less power than rival (125 kW vs 135 kW)
No factory service plan
Mitsubishi Triton
More powerful engine (135 kW)
Factory service plan included
Higher fuel consumption (8.3 l/100km)
Higher starting price
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Ranger or Triton?
The Ranger uses 7.4 l/100km and the Triton uses 8.3 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Ranger is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Ranger or Triton?
The Ranger produces 125 kW and 405 Nm of torque while the Triton delivers 135 kW and 430 Nm of torque. The Triton is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the Ranger and Triton?
The Ranger starts from R735 000 and the Triton from R889 990. The Ranger is cheaper by R154 990 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Ranger or Triton?
The Ranger has a braked towing capacity of 3500 Kg and the Triton can tow 3500 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Ranger or the Triton?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.