VS
At a Glance
Power
125 kW
81 kW
Torque
405 Nm
200 Nm
Fuel
7.1 l/100km
8.9 l/100km
Towing
2400 Kg
1345 Kg
Engine
1996 cc
2442 cc
Choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Mitsubishi Triton is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Ford Ranger delivers 125 kW while the Mitsubishi Triton produces 81 kW. On fuel, the Ranger returns 7.1 l/100km while the Triton uses 8.9 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R635 200 for the Ranger and R639 990 for the Triton. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
125 kW
81 kW
Torque
405 Nm
200 Nm
Top Speed
—
—
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1996 cc
2442 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
diesel
diesel
Forced Induction Device
turbocharger
turbocharger
Transmission
manual
manual
Number of Gears
6
5
Drive Wheels
all
all
Full Time 4x4
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Low Range
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
7.1 l/100km
8.9 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
80 l
75 l
CO2 Emissions
186 g/km
233 g/km
Dimensions
Length
5320 mm
5320 mm
Width
2015-2208 mm
1865 mm
Height
1883 mm
1775 mm
Wheelbase
3270 mm
3130 mm
Ground Clearance
234 mm
221 mm
Kerb Weight
1900 Kg
1865 Kg
Doors
2
4
Seats
2
5
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
2400 Kg
1345 Kg
Load Capacity
1250 l
—
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
—
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
6
3
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
—
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
—
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
—
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
—
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Reversing Camera
✓ Standard
—
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
—
Park Distance Front
✓ Standard
—
Tow Bar
✓ Standard
—
Alloy Wheels
Optional
—
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
4
5
Warranty Distance
120000 Km
unlimited Km
Service Plan
Optional
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
6
5
Service Plan Distance
90000
90000
Service Intervals
15000
10000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Ford Ranger
4 / 4 categories
Performance
Ranger
Fuel Economy
Ranger
Value
Ranger
Practicality
Ranger
Pros & Cons
Ford Ranger
More powerful engine (125 kW)
Better fuel economy (7.1 l/100km)
Lower starting price (R635 200)
Higher towing capacity (2400 Kg)
No factory service plan
Mitsubishi Triton
Factory service plan included
Higher fuel consumption (8.9 l/100km)
Less power than rival (81 kW vs 125 kW)
Higher starting price
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Ranger or Triton?
The Ranger uses 7.1 l/100km and the Triton uses 8.9 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Ranger is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Ranger or Triton?
The Ranger produces 125 kW and 405 Nm of torque while the Triton delivers 81 kW and 200 Nm of torque. The Ranger is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the Ranger and Triton?
The Ranger starts from R635 200 and the Triton from R639 990. The Ranger is cheaper by R4 790 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Ranger or Triton?
The Ranger has a braked towing capacity of 2400 Kg and the Triton can tow 1345 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Ranger or the Triton?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.