VS
At a Glance
Power
222 kW
120 kW
Torque
452 Nm
400 Nm
Fuel
9.3 l/100km
10.0 l/100km
Towing
3500 Kg
2250 Kg
Engine
2261 cc
1996 cc
Choosing between the Ford Ranger and the GWM P300 is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Ford Ranger delivers 222 kW while the GWM P300 produces 120 kW. On fuel, the Ranger returns 9.3 l/100km while the P300 uses 10.0 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R839 600 for the Ranger and R499 950 for the P300. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
222 kW
120 kW
Torque
452 Nm
400 Nm
Top Speed
—
—
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
2261 cc
1996 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
petrol
diesel
Forced Induction Device
turbocharger
turbocharger
Transmission
automatic
manual
Number of Gears
10
6
Drive Wheels
rear
all
Full Time 4x4
—
✓ Standard
Low Range
—
✓ Standard
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
9.3 l/100km
10.0 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
80 l
78 l
CO2 Emissions
213 g/km
261 g/km
Dimensions
Length
5350 mm
5413 mm
Width
2015-2208 mm
1883 mm
Height
1886 mm
1882 mm
Wheelbase
3270 mm
3230 mm
Ground Clearance
237 mm
227 mm
Kerb Weight
2055 Kg
2030 Kg
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
3500 Kg
2250 Kg
Load Capacity
1045 l
1050 l
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
—
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
7
4
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
—
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
—
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control
✓ Standard
—
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Satellite Navigation
✓ Standard
—
Reversing Camera
✓ Standard
—
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
✓ Standard
—
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
—
Tow Bar
✓ Standard
—
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
4
7
Warranty Distance
120000 Km
200000 Km
Service Plan
Optional
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
6
7
Service Plan Distance
90000
75000
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Ford Ranger
3 / 4 categories
Performance
Ranger
Fuel Economy
Ranger
Value
P300
Practicality
Ranger
Pros & Cons
Ford Ranger
More powerful engine (222 kW)
Better fuel economy (9.3 l/100km)
Higher towing capacity (3500 Kg)
Higher starting price
No factory service plan
GWM P300
Lower starting price (R499 950)
Factory service plan included
Higher fuel consumption (10.0 l/100km)
Less power than rival (120 kW vs 222 kW)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Ranger or P300?
The Ranger uses 9.3 l/100km and the P300 uses 10.0 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Ranger is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Ranger or P300?
The Ranger produces 222 kW and 452 Nm of torque while the P300 delivers 120 kW and 400 Nm of torque. The Ranger is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the Ranger and P300?
The Ranger starts from R839 600 and the P300 from R499 950. The P300 is cheaper by R339 650 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Ranger or P300?
The Ranger has a braked towing capacity of 3500 Kg and the P300 can tow 2250 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Ranger or the P300?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.