VS
At a Glance
Power
135 kW
121 kW
Torque
480 Nm
213 Nm
Fuel
7.7 l/100km
6.6 l/100km
Towing
3000 Kg
1200 Kg
Engine
2370 cc
1998 cc
Choosing between the GWM Tank 300 and the Mazda CX-30 is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The GWM Tank 300 delivers 135 kW while the Mazda CX-30 produces 121 kW. On fuel, the Tank 300 returns 7.7 l/100km while the CX-30 uses 6.6 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R649 900 for the Tank 300 and R651 500 for the CX-30. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
135 kW
121 kW
Torque
480 Nm
213 Nm
Top Speed
—
196 Km/h
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
2370 cc
1998 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
diesel
petrol
Forced Induction Device
turbocharger
—
Transmission
automatic
automatic
Number of Gears
9
6
Drive Wheels
rear
front
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
7.7 l/100km
6.6 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
78 l
51 l
CO2 Emissions
202 g/km
150 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4760 mm
4395 mm
Width
1930 mm
1795-2040 mm
Height
1903 mm
1540 mm
Wheelbase
2750 mm
2655 mm
Ground Clearance
224 mm
175 mm
Kerb Weight
2190 Kg
1340 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Load Volume
400-1635 l
295-1200 l
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
3000 Kg
1200 Kg
Load Capacity
610 l
—
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✓ Standard
—
Airbag Count
7
7
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control
✓ Standard
—
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Reversing Camera
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Sunroof
—
✓ Standard
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
7
5
Warranty Distance
200000 Km
unlimited Km
Service Plan
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
7
5
Service Plan Distance
75000
unlimited
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
GWM Tank 300
3 / 4 categories
Performance
Tank 300
Fuel Economy
CX-30
Value
Tank 300
Practicality
Tank 300
Pros & Cons
GWM Tank 300
More powerful engine (135 kW)
Lower starting price (R649 900)
Higher towing capacity (3000 Kg)
Higher fuel consumption (7.7 l/100km)
Mazda CX-30
Better fuel economy (6.6 l/100km)
Less power than rival (121 kW vs 135 kW)
Higher starting price
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Tank 300 or CX-30?
The Tank 300 uses 7.7 l/100km and the CX-30 uses 6.6 l/100km on the combined cycle. The CX-30 is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Tank 300 or CX-30?
The Tank 300 produces 135 kW and 480 Nm of torque while the CX-30 delivers 121 kW and 213 Nm of torque. The Tank 300 is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the Tank 300 and CX-30?
The Tank 300 starts from R649 900 and the CX-30 from R651 500. The Tank 300 is cheaper by R1 600 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Tank 300 or CX-30?
The Tank 300 has a braked towing capacity of 3000 Kg and the CX-30 can tow 1200 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Tank 300 or the CX-30?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.