VS
At a Glance
Power
105 kW
77 kW
Torque
210 Nm
138 Nm
Fuel
7.8 l/100km
5.5 l/100km
Towing
—
1000 Kg
Engine
1497 cc
1462 cc
Choosing between the Haval Jolion and the Suzuki Fronx is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Haval Jolion delivers 105 kW while the Suzuki Fronx produces 77 kW. On fuel, the Jolion returns 7.8 l/100km while the Fronx uses 5.5 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R348 950 for the Jolion and R352 900 for the Fronx. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
105 kW
77 kW
Torque
210 Nm
138 Nm
Top Speed
—
175 Km/h
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1497 cc
1462 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
petrol
petrol
Forced Induction Device
turbocharger
—
Transmission
manual
manual
Number of Gears
6
5
Drive Wheels
front
front
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
7.8 l/100km
5.5 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
55 l
37 l
CO2 Emissions
179 g/km
129 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4472 mm
3995 mm
Width
1874 mm
1765 mm
Height
1581 mm
1550 mm
Wheelbase
2700 mm
2520 mm
Ground Clearance
—
170 mm
Kerb Weight
1345 Kg
1010 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Load Volume
337-1133 l
304-605-1009 l
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
—
1000 Kg
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
✓ Standard
—
Airbag Count
4
6
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
—
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
—
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Reversing Camera
—
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
7
5
Warranty Distance
200000 Km
200000 Km
Service Plan
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
7
4
Service Plan Distance
75000
60000
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Tie
2 / 4 categories
Performance
Jolion
Fuel Economy
Fronx
Value
Jolion
Practicality
Fronx
Pros & Cons
Haval Jolion
More powerful engine (105 kW)
Lower starting price (R348 950)
Higher fuel consumption (7.8 l/100km)
Suzuki Fronx
Better fuel economy (5.5 l/100km)
Less power than rival (77 kW vs 105 kW)
Higher starting price
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Jolion or Fronx?
The Jolion uses 7.8 l/100km and the Fronx uses 5.5 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Fronx is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Jolion or Fronx?
The Jolion produces 105 kW and 210 Nm of torque while the Fronx delivers 77 kW and 138 Nm of torque. The Jolion is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the Jolion and Fronx?
The Jolion starts from R348 950 and the Fronx from R352 900. The Jolion is cheaper by R3 950 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Jolion or Fronx?
The Jolion has a braked towing capacity of not specified and the Fronx can tow 1000 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Jolion or the Fronx?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.