VS
At a Glance
Power
121 kW
125 kW
Torque
213 Nm
350 Nm
Fuel
6.6 l/100km
6.6 l/100km
Towing
1200 Kg
—
Engine
1998 cc
1956 cc
Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and the Tata Harrier is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Mazda CX-30 delivers 121 kW while the Tata Harrier produces 125 kW. On fuel, the CX-30 returns 6.6 l/100km while the Harrier uses 6.6 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R539 800 for the CX-30 and R699 900 for the Harrier. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
121 kW
125 kW
Torque
213 Nm
350 Nm
Top Speed
196 Km/h
—
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1998 cc
1956 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
4
Fuel Type
petrol
diesel
Forced Induction Device
—
turbocharger
Transmission
automatic
automatic
Number of Gears
6
6
Drive Wheels
front
front
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
6.6 l/100km
6.6 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
51 l
50 l
CO2 Emissions
150 g/km
174 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4395 mm
4605 mm
Width
1795-2040 mm
1922-2131 mm
Height
1540 mm
1718 mm
Wheelbase
2655 mm
2741 mm
Ground Clearance
175 mm
—
Kerb Weight
1340 Kg
1823 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Load Volume
295-1200 l
445-815 l
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
1200 Kg
—
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
—
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
—
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
7
7
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
—
✓ Standard
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Reversing Camera
—
✓ Standard
Park Distance Rear
—
✓ Standard
Park Distance Front
—
✓ Standard
Sunroof
—
✓ Standard
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
5
5
Warranty Distance
unlimited Km
125000 Km
Service Plan
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
5
5
Service Plan Distance
unlimited
75000
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Mazda CX-30
2 / 4 categories
Performance
Harrier
Fuel Economy
Tied
Value
CX-30
Practicality
CX-30
Pros & Cons
Mazda CX-30
Lower starting price (R539 800)
Less power than rival (121 kW vs 125 kW)
Tata Harrier
More powerful engine (125 kW)
Higher starting price
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the CX-30 or Harrier?
The CX-30 uses 6.6 l/100km and the Harrier uses 6.6 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Harrier is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the CX-30 or Harrier?
The CX-30 produces 121 kW and 213 Nm of torque while the Harrier delivers 125 kW and 350 Nm of torque. The Harrier is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the CX-30 and Harrier?
The CX-30 starts from R539 800 and the Harrier from R699 900. The CX-30 is cheaper by R160 100 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the CX-30 or Harrier?
The CX-30 has a braked towing capacity of 1200 Kg and the Harrier can tow not specified. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the CX-30 or the Harrier?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.