VS
At a Glance
Power
85 kW
81 kW
Torque
148 Nm
200 Nm
Fuel
6.0 l/100km
4.8 l/100km
Towing
250 Kg
1000 Kg
0-100 km/h
10.4 s
9.7 s
Engine
1496 cc
999 cc
Choosing between the Mazda Mazda2 and the Volkswagen Polo Vivo is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Mazda Mazda2 delivers 85 kW while the Volkswagen Polo Vivo produces 81 kW. On fuel, the Mazda2 returns 6.0 l/100km while the Polo Vivo uses 4.8 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R417 300 for the Mazda2 and R363 300 for the Polo Vivo. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
85 kW
81 kW
Torque
148 Nm
200 Nm
0-100 kph
10.4 s
9.7 s
Top Speed
184 Km/h
196 Km/h
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1496 cc
999 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
4
3
Fuel Type
petrol
petrol
Forced Induction Device
—
turbocharger
Transmission
automatic
manual
Number of Gears
6
6
Drive Wheels
front
front
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
6.0 l/100km
4.8 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
44 l
45 l
CO2 Emissions
140 g/km
114 g/km
Dimensions
Length
4080 mm
3972 mm
Width
1695 mm
1682 mm
Height
1515 mm
1447 mm
Wheelbase
2570 mm
2470 mm
Ground Clearance
—
128 mm
Kerb Weight
1070 Kg
1092 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Load Volume
250 l
280-952 l
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
250 Kg
1000 Kg
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Brake Assist
✓ Standard
—
Stability Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Traction Control
—
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
6
4
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
—
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Climate Control
✓ Standard
—
Cruise Control
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Reversing Camera
✓ Standard
Optional
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
Optional
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
—
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
5
3 vehicle / 5 engine
Warranty Distance
unlimited Km
120000 vehicle / 150000 engine Km
Service Plan
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Service Plan Years
3
2
Service Plan Distance
unlimited
30000
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Volkswagen Polo Vivo
3 / 4 categories
Performance
Mazda2
Fuel Economy
Polo Vivo
Value
Polo Vivo
Practicality
Polo Vivo
Pros & Cons
Mazda Mazda2
More powerful engine (85 kW)
Higher fuel consumption (6.0 l/100km)
Higher starting price
Volkswagen Polo Vivo
Better fuel economy (4.8 l/100km)
Lower starting price (R363 300)
Higher towing capacity (1000 Kg)
Quicker 0-100 km/h (9.7 ss)
Less power than rival (81 kW vs 85 kW)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the Mazda2 or Polo Vivo?
The Mazda2 uses 6.0 l/100km and the Polo Vivo uses 4.8 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Polo Vivo is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the Mazda2 or Polo Vivo?
The Mazda2 produces 85 kW and 148 Nm of torque while the Polo Vivo delivers 81 kW and 200 Nm of torque. The Mazda2 is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the Mazda2 and Polo Vivo?
The Mazda2 starts from R417 300 and the Polo Vivo from R363 300. The Polo Vivo is cheaper by R54 000 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the Mazda2 or Polo Vivo?
The Mazda2 has a braked towing capacity of 250 Kg and the Polo Vivo can tow 1000 Kg. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the Mazda2 or the Polo Vivo?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.