VS
At a Glance
Power
60 kW
59 kW
Torque
115 Nm
104 Nm
Fuel
5.6 l/100km
5.4 l/100km
Towing
—
—
Engine
1199 cc
1197 cc
Choosing between the Citroen C3 and the Suzuki Eeco is one of the most common decisions South African car buyers face. The Citroen C3 delivers 60 kW while the Suzuki Eeco produces 59 kW. On fuel, the C3 returns 5.6 l/100km while the Eeco uses 5.4 l/100km — important in a market where fuel prices change monthly. Pricing starts at R274 900 for the C3 and R231 900 for the Eeco. Both vehicles have their merits. The right choice depends on your priorities: fuel economy, performance, towing ability, safety features or total cost of ownership. This comparison covers every specification available so you can make an informed decision.
Performance
Power Output
60 kW
59 kW
Torque
115 Nm
104 Nm
Top Speed
—
—
Engine & Drivetrain
Engine Capacity
1199 cc
1197 cc
Engine Layout
inline
inline
Cylinders
3
4
Fuel Type
petrol
petrol
Transmission
manual
manual
Number of Gears
5
5
Drive Wheels
front
rear
Fuel Economy
Fuel Consumption Average
5.6 l/100km
5.4 l/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity
45 l
32 l
CO2 Emissions
133 g/km
—
Dimensions
Length
3987 mm
3675 mm
Width
1733- mm
1475 mm
Height
1599 mm
1825 mm
Wheelbase
2540 mm
2350 mm
Ground Clearance
180 mm
160 mm
Kerb Weight
990 / 1022 Kg
935 Kg
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
2
Load Volume
315 l
—
Towing & Payload
Towing Capacity
—
—
Load Capacity
385 l
615 l
Safety
ABS
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
EBD
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Stability Control
—
✓ Standard
Airbag Count
6
2
Driver Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Passenger Airbag
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Side Airbags Front
✓ Standard
—
Curtain Airbags
✓ Standard
—
Features & Tech
Air Conditioning
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Bluetooth
✓ Standard
—
Reversing Camera
✓ Standard
—
Park Distance Rear
✓ Standard
✓ Standard
Keyless Entry
✓ Standard
—
Alloy Wheels
✓ Standard
—
Warranty & Service
Warranty Period
5
3
Warranty Distance
100000 Km
100000 Km
Service Plan
✓ Standard
—
Service Plan Years
2
—
Service Plan Distance
30000
—
Service Intervals
15000
15000
The Verdict
Which Wins?
Overall Winner
Tie
2 / 4 categories
Performance
C3
Fuel Economy
Eeco
Value
Eeco
Practicality
C3
Pros & Cons
Citroen C3
More powerful engine (60 kW)
Factory service plan included
Higher fuel consumption (5.6 l/100km)
Higher starting price
Suzuki Eeco
Better fuel economy (5.4 l/100km)
Lower starting price (R231 900)
Less power than rival (59 kW vs 60 kW)
No factory service plan
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more fuel efficient, the C3 or Eeco?
The C3 uses 5.6 l/100km and the Eeco uses 5.4 l/100km on the combined cycle. The Eeco is the more fuel-efficient choice. In South African conditions with a mix of highway and urban driving, real-world figures will be slightly higher.
Which has more power, the C3 or Eeco?
The C3 produces 60 kW and 115 Nm of torque while the Eeco delivers 59 kW and 104 Nm of torque. The C3 is the more powerful option.
What is the price difference between the C3 and Eeco?
The C3 starts from R274 900 and the Eeco from R231 900. The Eeco is cheaper by R43 000 at this variant level. Final on-the-road pricing varies by dealer and specification.
Which has a higher towing capacity, the C3 or Eeco?
The C3 has a braked towing capacity of 0 Kg and the Eeco can tow not specified. Always verify towing limits in the owner's manual before hitching a trailer.
Should I buy the C3 or the Eeco?
It depends on your priorities. If fuel economy matters most, check the L/100km figures above. If you need towing capacity, compare the towing ratings. For day-to-day South African driving - load shedding runs, potholed roads, school runs and highway commutes - consider ground clearance, service network coverage, and total cost of ownership including insurance and maintenance. Use the spec tables above to compare every detail before making your decision.